Skip to main content

​
Why Use an Agentic Harness Instead of ChatGPT?

ChatGPT and IDE copilots are general-purpose code generators. SignalPilot is a specialized agentic harness built for data investigation — it connects to institutional knowledge those tools can’t access, runs long-term investigations with analyst oversight, and learns your team’s domain patterns.

​
Head-to-Head Comparison

CapabilityChatGPT + JupyterIDE Copilots (Cursor, GitHub)SignalPilot Agentic Harness
Full organizational context❌ Manual copy-paste❌ Code files only✅ DB schemas, dbt lineage, Slack, Jira, query history via MCP subagent
Long-running investigations❌ Single-shot responses❌ Single-file edits✅ Multi-step loop with analyst-in-the-loop approval
Domain knowledge retention❌ No memory❌ No memory✅ Multi-session memory of past hypotheses, assumptions, quirks
Team-specific customization❌ Generic❌ Generic✅ Custom skills (analysis patterns) + rules (coding standards, business logic)
Control & oversight❌ Run output yourself⚠️ Auto-applies changes✅ Plan approval, hooks, audit trail
Why “harness”? SignalPilot provides the infrastructure (context aggregation, execution environment, memory, customization) that lets AI agents work effectively on complex data investigations. You stay in control while AI handles the heavy lifting.

​
Real-World Investigation: Traditional vs SignalPilot

Scenario: Your CFO asks “Why did conversion rate drop 8% last week?”

​
ChatGPT + Jupyter (2+ hours, no learning)

  1. ⏱️ Open Snowflake, manually explore tables
    • No context about which tables matter
    • Might miss upstream dependencies
  2. ⏱️ Copy schema to ChatGPT, ask for query
    • ChatGPT hallucinates column names
    • No access to dbt lineage or transformations
  3. ⏱️ Run query, hit errors, iterate 3-4 times
    • Manual debugging
    • No access to query history for patterns
  4. ⏱️ Check Slack manually (scroll 100+ messages)
    • Time-consuming
    • Might miss relevant threads
  5. ⏱️ Find Jira ticket about A/B test
    • Manual search across tools
    • No automated connection to related docs
  6. ⏱️ Write more queries based on findings
    • Start from scratch each time
    • No memory of what was already tested
  7. ⏱️ Create visualization in notebook
    • Generic, doesn’t follow team standards
    • Manual chart styling
  8. ❌ Write summary, forget assumptions
    • No institutional knowledge captured
    • Next analyst will repeat this work
Result:
  • ⏱️ 2+ hours spent
  • 🧠 No learning for next time
  • 😓 High cognitive load

​
Value by Persona

Problem: Spend 80% of time gathering context, 20% doing analysisSignalPilot solves:
  • ✅ Automatic context aggregation from dbt, Slack, Jira, query history
  • ✅ Multi-session memory means you don’t re-investigate same issues
  • ✅ Team skills library gives you templates for common analyses
Impact:
  • ⏱️ 10x faster investigation prep (2 hours → 10 minutes)
  • 🎯 More time for actual insight generation
  • 📈 Higher quality analysis with institutional knowledge
Problem: Junior analysts constantly interrupt with “which table should I use?”SignalPilot solves:
  • ✅ dbt lineage awareness guides analysts to correct models
  • ✅ Rules enforce performance patterns (no iterrows(), proper vectorization)
  • ✅ Skills codify senior engineer analysis patterns for juniors
Impact:
  • 📉 Fewer interruptions (“AI knows the lineage”)
  • ✅ Consistent code quality (rules enforced automatically)
  • 🚀 Faster junior onboarding (skills library)
Problem: Analysis quality depends on analyst tenure. Tribal knowledge lost when people leave.SignalPilot solves:
  • ✅ Multi-session memory captures validated assumptions, known quirks
  • ✅ Skills library preserves senior analyst patterns
  • ✅ Hooks enforce governance (e.g., “only query prod during office hours”)
Impact:
  • 🏢 Institutional knowledge doesn’t walk out the door
  • ⚡ New analysts productive faster (access to team playbook)
  • ✅ Audit trail for compliance (what data accessed, when, why)
Problem: Experimentation analysis lacks organizational context (past experiments, Jira tickets, design docs)SignalPilot solves:
  • ✅ Connects to Jira (experiment tickets), Slack (discussions), past notebooks
  • ✅ Memory recalls: “Last A/B test issue was sample ratio mismatch”
  • ✅ Skills: Reusable experiment analysis templates
Impact:
  • 📊 Better experiment design (learn from past mistakes)
  • 🔍 Faster root cause analysis (context from Jira/Slack)
  • 🎓 Knowledge transfer (new DS gets team patterns)

​
Common Questions

You could, but:
  • ❌ ChatGPT has no access to your dbt lineage, Slack, Jira, query history
  • ❌ You’d need to manually copy-paste schemas, discussions, tickets (hours of work)
  • ❌ No memory across conversations — every investigation starts from zero
  • ❌ No enforcement of your team’s coding standards or business logic
  • ❌ Can’t execute code in your environment (copy-paste loop)
SignalPilot:
  • ✅ Auto-aggregates context from all sources via MCP
  • ✅ Remembers past investigations (institutional knowledge)
  • ✅ Executes code in Jupyter with approval checkpoints
  • ✅ Enforces your team’s rules and applies your custom skills
IDE copilots are great for software engineering, but:
  • ❌ Only see code files (no dbt, Slack, Jira, query history context)
  • ❌ Single-file edits (not multi-step data investigations)
  • ❌ No domain-specific memory (can’t learn your data stack quirks)
  • ❌ Generic suggestions (don’t know your business logic)
  • ⚠️ Auto-apply changes (less control in data workflows)
SignalPilot is purpose-built for data investigation:
  • ✅ Full organizational context via MCP sidecar
  • ✅ Long-running investigation loop (multi-step with approval)
  • ✅ Multi-session memory (learns your data stack)
  • ✅ Team customization (skills + rules)
  • ✅ Analyst-in-the-loop (you approve plans before execution)
Yes! They’re complementary:Use ChatGPT/Copilot for:
  • General coding questions outside data investigations
  • Learning new programming concepts
  • Code refactoring suggestions
Use SignalPilot for:
  • Data investigations that require organizational context
  • Multi-step analyses with dbt/Slack/Jira integration
  • Building institutional knowledge for your team
  • Enforcing data team standards and business logic
Many teams use both: Copilot for code editing, SignalPilot for data investigations.
No. SignalPilot is a harness, not a replacement.What SignalPilot does:
  • ✅ Aggregates context so analysts don’t waste hours gathering it
  • ✅ Proposes investigation plans (analyst approves before execution)
  • ✅ Executes repetitive query/plot generation
  • ✅ Captures institutional knowledge for the team
What analysts do:
  • ✅ Define the investigation question
  • ✅ Approve plans (analyst-in-the-loop)
  • ✅ Interpret results with business context
  • ✅ Make strategic recommendations
Impact: Analysts spend more time on high-value insight generation, less on context gathering and boilerplate.

​
Why “Agentic Harness”?

The harness metaphor is intentional. Just like a climbing harness provides infrastructure that keeps you safe while enabling you to climb higher, SignalPilot provides the infrastructure that lets AI agents work effectively on complex data investigations while keeping analysts in control. The 4 foundational systems:
  1. Context Layer (MCP) → Organizational knowledge ChatGPT can’t access
  2. Long-Running Loop → Multi-step investigations with human approval
  3. Memory & Hooks → Institutional learning + safety guardrails
  4. Skills & Rules → Team-specific domain expertise
Together: AI-forward data teams get the speed of AI with the control, safety, and domain expertise they need for production investigations.

Deep Dive: How It Works

See detailed architecture breakdown with real-world example

​
Next Steps

Try SignalPilot

5-minute quickstartDebug a revenue drop with your data

How It Works

Architecture deep dive4 foundational systems explained

Security & Privacy

Trust & complianceRead-only access, zero retention, audit trail

Installation

Get startedInstall in under 2 minutes